What does an organization do when the real numbers don’t support the agenda they are pushing?
Fudge the numbers. Cherry pick what helps prop up the lie and ignore the real facts.
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has been doing just that in order to support their biggest science scandal: global warming. Selling their brand of science, their “truth” about global warming brings in extra funding, yet their data is off by 50%.
For the past 18 years, satellites have shown no global warming, where as the “the land based data sets like the ones maintained by NOAA for the US Historical Climate Network (USHCN) continue to show a warming trend.” How can this be?
One explanation, by meteorologist Anthony Watts, shows NOAA using readings from areas that experience Urban Heat Island effect, that is instruments surrounded by buildings, roads or airports nearby which raises the temperatures due to local “environment” and not climate or weather.
The greatest science scandal of all time is global warming. The numbers don’t lie, except when the NOAA cherry picks only the data that pushes their global warming agenda and drives funding.
The Telegraph recently published an article that exposes how the data supporting global warming ‘science’, specifically official temperature records, have been manipulated systematically to give the appearance that the Earth has warmed considerably more than it actually has,” shared Truth and Action.
Manipulation of numbers to support the lie of global warming has been uncovered by Paul Homewood of Notalotofpeopleknowthat blog.
First these were made by the US government’s Global Historical Climate Network (GHCN). They were then amplified by two of the main official surface records, the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (Giss) and the National Climate Data Center (NCDC), which use the warming trends to estimate temperatures across the vast regions of the Earth where no measurements are taken. Yet these are the very records on which scientists and politicians rely for their belief in “global warming”.
The NOAA has taken their falsified numbers and claimed them as fact to present a narrative that is counter to what satellite evidence that have shown no global warming for at least 18 years.
If, however, you look at those weather stations that haven’t been corrupted – “unperturbed” stations – what you get is US global warming roughly half as much as NOAA claims.
Whether this represents mere incompetence or calculated fraud by NOAA is for future courts to decide. What we do know is that the problem dates back at least to the 1990s when, for some unexplained reason, NOAA decided to halve the number of weather stations used for its official records. Even more mysteriously, the ones it chose to keep tended to show more global warming while the ones it rejected tended to show much less.
What is in it for the NOAA, Giss and GHCN if not money and power? Why cook the books to “prove global warming” if there is not a financial incentive?
But if taxpayer funded scientists at NOAA and NASA have been tampering with the raw data – even to the point of cooking the books so that a cooling trend has been turned in warming one – why haven’t we heard about this before?
Where are the journalist and media in this great scandal? Why have they helped promote the lie instead of working to uncover the truth? Do the global warming cartels own the media? If the media reported the truth, the money would dry up for this great hoax and the fat cats feasting on the false science would suddenly loss their meal ticket.