It appears U.S. Attorney Wendy Olsen has her feathers ruffled because her investigation into the sexual-assault of a five-year-old girl has been questioned by the citizens of Twin Falls, Idaho, as well as the media and online bloggers.
Lashing out at those who are searching for the truth, instead of doing her job and protecting the young female victim against those who hurt her, she issued a threat to any who questions her leadership calling it harassment.
A cover-up seems to be underway in the Twin Falls Idaho, as the rape of five-year-old girl, at the hands of three young boys, is just now being vaguely mentioned by the local news. The sexual assault occurred on June 2, but was not reported for five days, and within that report, the sterile nature, the ‘scrubbing of vital information” is evident.
It is not a matter of “he said, she said”, as the assault was videoed by the 13-year-old boy and is now in the hands of police. The sick evidence on that phone, grabbed by the little girl’s mom speaks against the perpetrators.
The problem seems to lie in the fact that they boys are underage and Syrian Refugees from the local SCI Refugee Center in Twin Falls. Perhaps the media is covering it up on their own, or maybe, based on the recent events at the Twin Falls City Council meeting, there is pressure to keep the story buried as long as possible.
Nevertheless, young boys raised in the Muslim faith, and brought here by President Obama, raped a child. Even if they are too young to prosecute as some have alleged, their parents should be held responsible for their children’s behavior.
This is the story that has the nation in an uproar and Obama’s attorney in Idaho threatening those who are speaking out against it.
Had the U.S. Attorney Wendy Olsen been forthright from the start of this case, then perhaps she would not be feeling the hear from those concerned citizens and journalist who care than a 5-year-old girl was sexually assaulted by three refugee boys at her Twin Falls apartment. But as the investigators kept the story covered-up and provided no information, others searched for answers and are holding Olsen’s feet to the fire.
The tiny girl was found naked and being sexually assaulted by three boys at the Twin Falls home. Had a neighbor not found her, who knows what worse could have happened.
KMVT has confirmed that a reported sexual assault that possibly occurred near the Fawnbrook Apartments is being investigated by the Twin Falls Police Department. The incident allegedly occurred on June 2.
Twin Falls County Prosecutor Grant Loebs has confirmed the investigation to Idaho’s First News, but he says there will be no charges filed in the case until the police investigation is complete.
Several unconfirmed reports concerning the case are circulating on social media. Both the Twin Falls Police Department and the prosecutor’s office have declined to comment publicly on the case while it is still under investigation.
“Since the attack took place, the diverse perpetrators and their families have been evicted from their low-income apartments,” reports Breitbart.
U.S. Attorney Wendy Olsen threatened anyone who opposed her by saying:
The United States Attorney’s Office extends its support to the five-year-old victim of assault, and her family, at the Fawnbrook Apartments in Twin Falls. The United States Attorney’s Office further encourages community members in Twin Falls and throughout Idaho to remain calm and supportive, to pay close attention to the facts that have been released by law enforcement and the prosecuting attorney, and to avoid spreading false rumors and inaccuracies … The spread of false information or inflammatory or threatening statements about the perpetrators or the crime itself reduces public safety and may violate federal law. We have seen time and again that the spread of falsehoods about refugees divides our communities. I urge all citizens and residents to allow Mr. Loebs and Chief Kingsbury and their teams to do their jobs.
She may personally be feeling harassed as there appears to be a political agenda attached to her investigation, protecting the refugees brought to Twin Falls by Obama, while not doing her due diligence to provide justice to the victim and her family. She reissued her threat again saying that the public’s opinion and shared information is in her eyes harassing communication.
“The [first] statement was not intended to and does not threaten to arrest or prosecute anyone for First Amendment protected speech … [but] certain threatening or harassing communications may violate federal law and will be investigated,” she insisted in her new Tuesday, June 28 statement.
Her new statement says that “harassing” politicians may be a crime, even though the First Amendment to the constitution confirms “the right of the people…to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”Many in the press, public and online bloggers are misinterpreting the statement I issued on Friday, June 24, 2016, in support of the five-year-old victim of an assault in Twin Falls, Idaho, and in support of the law enforcement authorities there who are prosecuting the case. The statement was not intended to and does not threaten to arrest or prosecute anyone for First Amendment protected speech.
I issued the statement because public officials in Twin Falls have received threats. Certain threatening or harassing communications may violate federal law and will be investigated. I am also concerned that intentionally false and inflammatory rumors are creating an unsafe environment in Twin Falls. In this case, it appears that the threats have resulted from false and inflammatory information spread about this crime, often times by those from outside of the community. I encourage all to be patient while the juvenile justice system works. I also encourage all to support this victim and her family.”
Washington Post’s legal writer Eugene Volokh responded, “True threats of criminal conduct are punishable; but mere harassing communications to high-level officials are constitutionally protected.”
“I thus wish that Olson had limited her follow-up statement to true threats of criminal conduct, and didn’t also suggest the possibility of federal prosecution of an ill-defined range of ‘harassing communications.’ Still, the revised statement strikes me as much better than the original,” he wrote.
Olsen made the refugee families the victim, blaming the community for opposing the Obama administrations refuge resettlement program, while seemingly ignoring the child who was physically and mentally hurt by the refugee children.
“We have seen time and again that the spread of falsehoods about refugees divides our communities,” she claimed.
Americans are spreading “false and inflammatory rumors,” Olson claimed.
Does Olson truly believe her own gibberish or is her boss Obama keeping her accountable to his refugee doctrine?